Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 156
Filtrar
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 156(4): 559-568, 2021 Sep 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769453

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Second-opinion pathology review identifies clinically significant diagnostic discrepancies for some patients. Discrepancy rates and laboratory-specific costs in a single health care system for patients referred from regional affiliates to a comprehensive cancer center ("main campus") have not been reported. METHODS: Main campus second-opinion pathology cases for 740 patients from eight affiliated hospitals during 2016 to 2018 were reviewed. Chart review was performed to identify changes in care due to pathology review. To assess costs of pathology interpretation, reimbursement rates for consultation Current Procedural Terminology billing codes were compared with codes that would have been used had the cases originated at the main campus. RESULTS: Diagnostic discrepancies were identified in 104 (14.1%) patients, 30 (4.1%) of which resulted in a change in care. In aggregate, reimbursement for affiliate cases was 65.6% of the reimbursement for the same cases had they originated at the main campus. High-volume organ systems with low relative consultation reimbursement included gynecologic, breast, and thoracic. CONCLUSIONS: Preventable diagnostic errors are reduced by pathology review for patients referred within a single health care system. Although the resulting changes in care potentially lead to overall cost savings, the financial value of referral pathology review could be improved.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Patologia Cirúrgica/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Codificação Clínica , Redução de Custos , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Patologia Cirúrgica/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 92(2): 172-176, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33106368

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prompt diagnosis and early treatment prevents disability in Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal-protein and Skin Changes (POEMS) syndrome. Delay in diagnosis is common with 55% of patients initially incorrectly diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Patients are often treated with intravenous immunoglobulin which is both expensive and ineffective in the treatment of POEMS. Testing patients with acquired demyelinating neuropathy with serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) more accurately identifies POEMS syndrome than the current standard of care. Incorporating VEGF testing into screening could prevent misdiagnosis and reduce costs. METHODS: We used observed treatment information for patients in the University College London Hospital's POEMS syndrome database (n=100) and from the National Immunoglobulin Database to estimate costs associated with incorrect CIDP diagnoses across our cohort. We conducted a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the current diagnostic algorithm with an alternative which includes VEGF testing for all patients with an acquired demyelinating neuropathy. RESULTS: Treatment associated with an incorrect CIDP diagnosis led to total wasted healthcare expenditures of between £808 550 and £1 111 756 across our cohort, with an average cost-per-POEMS-patient misdiagnosed of £14 701 to £20 214. Introducing mandatory VEGF testing for patients with acquired demyelinating neuropathy would lead to annual cost-savings of £107 398 for the National Health Service and could prevent misdiagnosis in 16 cases per annum. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis in POEMS syndrome results in diagnostic delay, disease progression and significant healthcare costs. Introducing mandatory VEGF testing for patients with acquired demyelinating neuropathy is a cost-effective strategy allowing for early POEMS diagnosis and potentially enabling prompt disease-directed therapy.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Síndrome POEMS/diagnóstico , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/sangue , Controle de Custos/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Síndrome POEMS/sangue , Síndrome POEMS/economia
3.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 23(6): 417-421, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347787

RESUMO

Importance: It is important to recognize factors that may mitigate the risk of a potential lawsuit and increase knowledge and awareness of physicians. Objective: To evaluate and characterize facial nerve paralysis litigation claims and related potential causes. Design, Setting, and Participants: These data were extracted from the two main computerized legal databases: WestLaw and LexisNexis. The data were queried on April 2, 2020. The records from 1919 to 2020 were obtained from a population-based setting. A total of 186 cases were included. Data were gathered for all alleged cases of facial nerve paralysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: There was a continuous rise in the amount of malpractice payments with the highest mean amount being in the past decade. Results: From 1919 to 2020, a total of 186 malpractice cases for facial nerve damage were identified. A total amount of $89,178,857.99 was rewarded to plaintiffs in 66 cases. The mean amount of paid malpractice claim was $1,351,194.80. Improper performance/treatment was the most common reason for alleged litigation (n = 97). This was followed by misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis (n = 47), and failure of informed consent (n = 34). The highest number of malpractice claims with a total of 53 cases was from 1991 to 2000. The highest mean amount per payment was in the past decade (2011-2020) with a mean of $3,841,052.68. Conclusions and Relevance: Over the past century, improper performance/procedure, delayed/misdiagnosis, and failure of informed consent were the most common reasons for litigations related to facial nerve paralysis.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/etiologia , Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Otolaringologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Plástica/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/tendências , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/economia , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/epidemiologia , Paralisia Facial/economia , Paralisia Facial/epidemiologia , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/estatística & dados numéricos , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/tendências , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/tendências , Otolaringologia/economia , Otolaringologia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(6): 102693, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866849

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Facial nerve paralysis from head and neck tumors can result from disease progression or iatrogenic causes, leading to litigation. The aim of this study was to investigate lawsuits regarding facial paralysis as a consequence of these tumors to understand and better educate physicians behind the reasons for litigation. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews were obtained from the Westlaw database from 1985 to 2018. Gathered data, including verdicts, litigation reasons, defendant specialties, and amounts awarded, were analyzed via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. RESULTS: Of the 26 lawsuits analyzed, the leading reason for litigation was failure to diagnose (53.8%), followed by iatrogenic injury (34.6%). The average award was $2,704,470. Otolaryngologists were the most common defendants. Defendants that included an otolaryngologist had shorter delays of diagnosis compared to those that did not (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Failure to diagnose parotid injury was the leading cause of litigation. In instances where the jury found for the plaintiff, the amount was material. There were equivalent incidences of cases in favor of plaintiffs and defendants.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Nervo Facial , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Doença Iatrogênica , Jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Otorrinolaringologistas/economia , Otorrinolaringologistas/legislação & jurisprudência , Paralisia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glândula Parótida/lesões , Adulto Jovem
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(31): e21385, 2020 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32756129

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To perform a cost-error analysis based on a quasi-experimental pre-post study of the preanalytical errors in 2 hospital laboratories. The real cost and theoretical cost are defined as the cost resulting from errors with or without the training intervention. The real impact associated to the training program was estimated, calculated as the total associated to the preanalytical errors cost difference. The costs were measured using Andalusian Public Health Service fees. Cost analysis of an educational intervention presented in a previous study from 2017. Preanalytical errors were detected in the laboratories of the University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria (Málaga, Spain) and in the University Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez (Huelva, Spain). METHODS: The founded errors were divided into blood and urine samples. Univariate sensitivity analysis was used to assess how parameter uncertainty impacted on overall results. Variations of parameters between 0% and 5% were substituted into the base case. RESULTS: The real impact associated with educational intervention in LAB1 was an increase of &OV0556;16,961.378, and the expected impact was an increase &OV0556;78,745.27 (difference of &OV0556;61,783.9). In LAB2, the real impact in the same period amounted to &OV0556;260,195.37, and the expected impact was &OV0556;193,905.83 (difference of -&OV0556;66,289.54). The results were different in the 2 laboratories, proving the intervention in only one of them to be more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Costs analysis determined that this training intervention can provide saves in the costs, as the effectiveness of the educational sessions in reducing preanalytical errors currently results in a significant decrease of the costs associated with these errors.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Capacitação em Serviço/economia , Laboratórios Hospitalares/normas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Manejo de Espécimes/normas
6.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237145, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are prevalent and associated with increased economic burden; however, little is known about their characteristics at the national level in Japan. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes and indemnity payment in cases of diagnostic errors using Japan's largest database of national claims. METHODS: We analyzed characteristics of diagnostic error cases closed between 1961 and 2017, accessed through the national Japanese malpractice claims database. We compared diagnostic error-related claims (DERC) with non-diagnostic error-related claims (non-DERC) in terms of indemnity, clinical outcomes, and factors underlying physicians' diagnostic errors. RESULTS: All 1,802 malpractice claims were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 33 years (interquartile range = 10-54), and 54.2% were men. Deaths were the most common outcome of claims (939/1747; 53.8%). In total, 709 (39.3%, 95% CI: 37.0%-41.6%) DERC cases were observed. The adjusted total billing amount, acceptance rate, adjusted median claims payments, and proportion of deaths were significantly higher in DERC than non-DERC cases. Departments of internal medicine and surgery were 1.42 and 1.55 times more likely, respectively, to have DERC cases than others. Claims involving the emergency room (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.88) and outpatient office (adjusted OR = 2.87) were more likely to be DERC than other cases. The initial diagnoses most likely to lead to diagnostic error were upper respiratory tract infection, non-bleeding digestive tract disease, and "no abnormality." CONCLUSIONS: Cases of diagnostic errors produced severe patient outcomes and were associated with high indemnity. These cases were frequently noted in general exam and emergency rooms as well as internal medicine and surgery departments and were initially considered to be common, mild diseases.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estatística & dados numéricos , Japão , Masculino , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 7(1): 37-43, 2020 01 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31535831

RESUMO

Background Misdiagnosis of dangerous cerebrovascular disease is a substantial public health problem. We sought to identify and describe breakdowns in the diagnostic process among patients with ischemic stroke to facilitate future improvements in diagnostic accuracy. Methods We performed a retrospective, descriptive study of medical malpractice claims housed in the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Strategies Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) database from 1/1/2006 to 1/1/2016 involving ischemic stroke patients. Baseline claimant demographics, clinical setting, primary allegation category, and outcomes were abstracted. Among cases with a primary diagnosis-related allegation, we detail presenting symptoms and diagnostic breakdowns using CRICO's proprietary taxonomy. Results A total of 478 claims met inclusion criteria; 235 (49.2%) with diagnostic error. Diagnostic errors originated in the emergency department (ED) in 46.4% (n = 109) of cases, outpatient clinic in 27.7% (n = 65), and inpatient setting in 25.1% (n = 59). Across care-settings, the most frequent process breakdown was in the initial patient-provider encounter [76.2% (n = 179 cases)]. Failure to assess, communicate, and respond to ongoing symptoms was the component of the patient-provider encounter most frequently identified as a source of misdiagnosis in the ED. Exclusively non-traditional presenting symptoms occurred in 35.7% (n = 84), mixed traditional and non-traditional symptoms in 30.6% (n = 72), and exclusively traditional in 23.8% (n = 56) of diagnostic error cases. Conclusions Among ischemic stroke patients, breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter were the most frequent source of diagnostic error. Targeted interventions should focus on the initial diagnostic encounter, particularly for ischemic stroke patients with atypical symptoms.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/patologia , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/economia , Imperícia/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Injury ; 50(9): 1511-1515, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31399208

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing global demand for specialized radiological investigations has resulted in delayed or non-reporting of plain trauma radiographs by radiologists. This is particularly true in resource-limited environments, where referring clinicians rely largely on their own radiographic interpretation. A wide accuracy range has been documented for non-radiologist reporting of conventional trauma radiographs. The Lodox Statscan whole-body digital X-ray machine is a relatively new technology that poses unique interpretive challenges. The fracture detection rate of trauma clinicians utilizing this modality has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: An audit of the polytrauma fracture detection rate of clinicians evaluating Lodox Statscan bodygrams in two South African public-sector Trauma Units. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of imaging data of Cape Town Level 1-equivalent public-sector Trauma Units during March-April 2015. Statscan bodygrams acquired for adult polytrauma triage were reviewed and correlated with follow-up imaging and patient records. Missed fractures were stratified by body part, mechanism of injury and ventilatory support. The fracture detection rate was determined with 95% confidence. The Generalised Fischer Exact Test assessed any association between the fracture site and failure of detection. Specialist orthopaedic review assessed the potential need for surgical management of missed fractures. RESULTS: 227 patients (male = 193, 85%; mean age: 33 years) were included; 195 fractures were demonstrated on the whole-body triage projections. Lower limb fractures predominated (n = 66, 34%). The fracture detection rate was 89% (95% CI = 86-93%), with the site of fracture associated with failure of detection (p = 0.01). Twelve of 21 undetected fractures (57%) involved the elbow or shoulder girdle. All elbow fractures (n = 3, 100%), more than half the shoulder girdle fractures (9/13,69%) and 12% (15/123) of extremity fractures were undetected. One missed fracture (1/21,4.7%) unequivocally required surgical management, while a further 7 (7/21, 33.3%) could potentially have benefitted from surgery, depending on follow-up imaging findings. CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of the accuracy of bodygram polytrauma fracture detection by clinicians. Particular review of the shoulder girdle, elbow and extremities for subtle fractures, in addition to standardized limb positioning, are recommended for improved diagnostic accuracy in this setting. These findings can inform clinician training courses in this domain.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/normas , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Imagem Corporal Total/normas , Adulto , Auditoria Clínica , Competência Clínica , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismo Múltiplo/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Setor Público , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Tecnologia Radiológica/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Triagem , Imagem Corporal Total/economia
9.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(4): 438-444, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blood culture contamination (BCC) increases length of stay (LOS) and leads to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy and/or hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). AIM: To quantify the magnitude of additional LOS, costs to hospitals and society, and harm to patients attributable to BCC. METHODS: A retrospective matched survival analysis was performed involving hospitalized patients with septicaemia-compatible symptoms. BCC costs, HACs and potential savings were calculated based on the primary LOS data, a modified Delphi process and published sources. The cost analysis compared standard care with interventions for reducing BCC, and estimated annual economic and clinical consequences for a typical hospital and for the USA as a whole. FINDINGS: Patients with BCC experienced a mean increase in LOS of 2.35 days (P=0.0076). Avoiding BCC would decrease costs by $6463 [$4818 from inpatient care (53% of which was from reduced LOS) and 26% from reduced antibiotic use]. Annually, in a typical 250- to 400-bed hospital, employing phlebotomists would save $1.3 million and prevent 24 HACs (including two cases of Clostridium difficile infection); based on clinical efficacy evidence, use of the studied initial specimen diversion device (ISDD) would save $1.9 million and prevent 34 HACs (including three cases of C. difficile infection). In the USA, the respective strategies would prevent 69,300 and 102,900 HACs (including 6000 and 8900 cases of C. difficile infection) and save $5 and $7.5 billion. CONCLUSION: Costs and clinical burdens associated with false-positive cultures are substantial and can be reduced by available interventions, including phlebotomists and use of ISDD.


Assuntos
Hemocultura/métodos , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
BMC Womens Health ; 19(1): 39, 2019 02 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808368

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic iron deficiency (ID) is a disorder affecting 10-20% of menstruating women. ID is diagnosed by measuring serum ferritin, a protein helping to store iron in the body. A deeper understanding of the association between ID and its societal and economic burden is relevant for patients, physicians, health care decision makers. METHODS: An online household survey was carried out among Swiss women aged 18-50 years suffering from debilitating symptoms due to ID. The data was population-weighted for age and region. The costs of misdiagnosis and the ID-related economic burden (i.e. days of sick leave) from productivity losses on the labor market were determined and extrapolated to the Swiss population. Furthermore, the patient burden was assessed based on quality of life daily measurements. RESULTS: The total sample included 1010 women who received an ID diagnosis with a blood test in the last 2 years (mean age: 33.5 years). Most named symptoms were "being tired or exhausted" (96.4%) and reduced physical energy level (41.0%). In total, 354 (35.0% of the total sample) patients received an initial diagnosis other than ID. Of those, 46.8% were treated prior to the ID diagnosis with a pharmacological medical therapy or psychotherapy. Extrapolating these numbers to the Swiss female population aged 18-50 years, the direct medical costs would be CHF 78 million (assuming an annual ID incidence of ID diagnosis of 9.5%). On average, 28.5% of participants in the work-force had to take sick leave due to ID symptoms within a period of 2 years (mean: 5.2 days, i.e. 2.6 days/year). The estimated annual indirect costs in Switzerland would be CHF 33 million (human capital approach) or CHF 26 million (friction cost method), respectively. Being exhausted and impaired concentration appear to be the most important factors negatively impacting daily living and hence quality of life. CONCLUSION: The societal and economic burden among women due to debilitating symptoms of ID in Switzerland is substantial. Timely, correct diagnosis and treatment of ID may contribute to reducing this burden. Further studies are needed in this area to validate our results.


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropriva/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Deficiências de Ferro , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia Ferropriva/sangue , Anemia Ferropriva/complicações , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Ferro/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Suíça , Adulto Jovem
11.
Emerg Radiol ; 26(4): 381-389, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790114

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Diagnostic imaging has mirrored the steady growth of healthcare utilization in the USA. This has created greater opportunity for diagnostic errors, which can be costly in terms of morbidity and mortality as well as dollars and cents. The purposes of this study were to describe all return visits to a tertiary care urban pediatric emergency department (PED) resulting from diagnostic imaging discrepancies and to calculate the costs of these return visits. METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2015, all children who underwent a diagnostic imaging study during an ED visit were assembled. Analysis was performed on all children who were called back and returned to the ED following a discrepant read. Direct and indirect costs to the patient, family, hospital, and society for these return visits were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, 8310 diagnostic imaging studies were performed, with 207 (2.5%) discrepant reads. Among the discrepant reads, 37 (0.4% of total, 17.9% of discrepant) patients had a return visit to the ED for further management. Including ED charges, time and travel costs to the family, and costs of radiation exposure, return visits for radiologic discrepancies over this 8-month period cost a total of $84,686.47, averaging $2288.82 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Though the overall diagnostic imaging discrepancy rate among our study population was low, the clinically significant discrepancies requiring return ED visits were potentially high risk, and costly for the patient, family, and healthcare system.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/economia , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino
12.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 69(Suppl 1)(1): S33-S36, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30697016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in patients with blunt trauma.. METHODS: The cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January to June 2015, and comprised alert, awake blunt-trauma patients. Pelvis examination findings were compared to routine pelvic X-rays. SPSS 19 was used for data analysis.. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients, 122 (92%) were males. Overall mean age was 37 ±14.2 years. There were 14 (10%) patients who were true positives with pelvic fracture diagnosis on both clinical examination and pelvic X-ray, while 14 (10%) were false negative on examination. Clinical examination missed 2 patients with evidence of fracture on X-ray and were considered false positive. Besides, 103 (77.4%) patients were true negative as both clinical exam and X-ray showed no evidence of fracture. CONCLUSION: Omitting pelvic X-ray in the recommended protocol can avoid unnecessary financial burden and reduce undesirable radiation exposure..


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , Ossos Pélvicos , Exame Físico/métodos , Radiografia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adulto , Controle de Custos , Estudos Transversais , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão , Gravidade do Paciente , Ossos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Radiografia/economia , Radiografia/métodos , Radiografia/normas , Saúde Radiológica , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia
13.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(2): 269-276, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315744

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine how misidentification of dementia affects estimation of Medicare costs in a largely minority cohort of participants for whom accurate in-person diagnoses are available. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project, a multiethnic, population-based, prospective study of cognitive aging of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals clinically diagnosed with dementia (n=495) and individuals clinically diagnosed without dementia (n=1,701). MEASUREMENTS: Medicare claims-identified dementia was defined according to the presence of any International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in all available claims during the study period. Participant characteristics associated with claims misidentification of dementia were estimated using logistic regression. Effects of dementia misidentification on Medicare expenditures were estimated using generalized linear models. RESULTS: Medicare claims correctly identified 250 of the 495 (51%) dementia cases and 1,565 of the 1,701 (92%) nondementia cases. Sensitivity of claims-identified dementia was 0.51, and specificity was 0.92. Average annual Medicare expenditures were $14,721 for a beneficiary with a clinical diagnosis of dementia, and $18,208 for a beneficiary with claim-identified dementia, suggesting an overestimation of $3,487 per person per year when Medicare claims were used to identify dementia. Total annual expenditures for all beneficiaries with claims-identified dementia were $258,707 lower than that for all those who were clinically diagnosed, suggesting an overall underestimation of total Medicare expenditures if Medicare claims were used to identify dementia. Different types of misidentification have different effects on dementia-related cost estimates. Average annual expenditures per person were highest for false positives. CONCLUSION: Misidentification of dementia in Medicare claims is common. Using claims to identify dementia may result in significantly biased estimates of the cost of dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:269-276, 2019.


Assuntos
Demência/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Washington
14.
Eur J Cancer ; 100: 55-64, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957561

RESUMO

The Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) is commonly used to diagnose adnexal masses. The aim of the present study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the RMI compared with subjective assessment (SA) by an expert and the following novel ultrasound models: Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses were performed from a societal perspective. A decision tree was constructed, and short-term costs and effects were examined in women with adnexal masses. Sensitivity, specificity and the costs of diagnostic strategies were incorporated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were expressed as costs/additional percentage of correctly diagnosed patients. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. Effectiveness was highest for SA (90.7% [95% confidence interval = 77.3-100]), with a cost saving of 5.0% (-€398 per patient [-€1403 to 549]) compared with the RMI. The costs of SR + SA were the lowest (€7180 [6072-8436]), resulting in a cost saving of 9.0% (-€709 per patient [-€1628 to 236]) compared with the RMI, with an effectiveness of 89.6% (75.8-100). SR + SA showed the highest probability of being the most cost-effective when willingness-to-pay was <€350 per additional percentage of correctly diagnosed patients. The RMI had low cost-effectiveness probabilities (<3%) and was inferior to SA, SR + SA and LR2. Budget impact in the Netherlands compared with that of the RMI varied between a cost saving of €4.67 million for SR + SA and additional costs of €3.83 million when implementing ADNEX (cut-off: 10%). The results were robust when tested in sensitivity analyses. Although SA is the best strategy in terms of diagnostic accuracy, SR + SA might be preferred from a cost-effectiveness perspective.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Ultrassonografia/economia , Absenteísmo , Orçamentos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Licença Médica/economia
16.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(12): 1784-1790, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571646

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Radiologists play an essential role in patient care by providing accurate and timely results. An error-free radiology report is an expectation of both patients and referring physicians. Software is currently available that can eliminate measurement and side types of errors while saving radiologists and sonographers time. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the potential reduction in report errors, estimate the potential time savings associated with implementation, and conduct a cost-benefit analysis of implementing two software programs. METHODS: Data on the number of measurement errors and side errors in ultrasound and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry reports were collected, and the time required for data entry that the software would reduce was measured by report type. Generalized estimating equations regression was used to estimate error rates and data entry times and corresponding 95% confidence intervals by report type for radiologists and sonographers. Current wages and report volumes were then applied to the time savings to estimate the annual wage savings. Projected volume increases were applied to the annual estimates to generate a 5-year savings estimate. RESULTS: Overall, measurement errors occurred in 6% to 28% of ultrasound reports, depending on the report type. Side errors were rare. It was estimated that over 5 years, the software could save $693,777 in radiologist wages and $130,771 in sonographer wages, a total of $824,548 (range, $621,866-$1,039,714). CONCLUSIONS: The use of data integration software would both significantly reduce errors in ultrasound and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry reports and save a considerable amount of time and money.


Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Prontuários Médicos/economia , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Interface para o Reconhecimento da Fala , Ultrassonografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
17.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 167(1): 195-203, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28879558

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To estimate the potential near-term population impact of alternative second opinion breast biopsy pathology interpretation strategies. METHODS: Decision analysis examining 12-month outcomes of breast biopsy for nine breast pathology interpretation strategies in the U.S. health system. Diagnoses of 115 practicing pathologists in the Breast Pathology Study were compared to reference-standard-consensus diagnoses with and without second opinions. Interpretation strategies were defined by whether a second opinion was sought universally or selectively (e.g., 2nd opinion if invasive). Main outcomes were the expected proportion of concordant breast biopsy diagnoses, the proportion involving over- or under-interpretation, and cost of care in U.S. dollars within one-year of biopsy. RESULTS: Without a second opinion, 92.2% of biopsies received a concordant diagnosis. Concordance rates increased under all second opinion strategies, and the rate was highest (95.1%) and under-treatment lowest (2.6%) when all biopsies had second opinions. However, over-treatment was lowest when second opinions were sought selectively for initial diagnoses of invasive cancer, DCIS, or atypia (1.8 vs. 4.7% with no 2nd opinions). This strategy also had the lowest projected 12-month care costs ($5.907 billion vs. $6.049 billion with no 2nd opinions). CONCLUSIONS: Second opinion strategies could lower overall care costs while reducing both over- and under-treatment. The most accurate cost-saving strategy required second opinions for initial diagnoses of invasive cancer, DCIS, or atypia.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Padrões de Referência , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Biópsia/economia , Biópsia/normas , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Patologistas/normas , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estados Unidos
18.
Trop Med Int Health ; 22(12): 1551-1560, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064144

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10 000 people die from suicide annually in Bangladesh, many from pesticide poisoning. We aimed to estimate financial costs to patients and health services of treating patients with self-poisoning. METHODS: Data on direct costs to families, sources of funds for treatment and family wealth were collected prospectively over a one-month period in 2016 at the tertiary Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. Aggregate operational costs to the government were calculated using annual budget, bed occupancy and length-of-stay data. RESULTS: Agrochemicals were the most common substances ingested (58.8%). Median duration of stay and of illness was 2 and 5 days, respectively. Median total cost to patients was conservatively estimated at US$ 98.40, highest in agrochemical poisoning (US$ 179.50), with the greatest cost due to medicines and equipment. Misdiagnosis as organophosphorus poisoning in 17.0% of agrochemical cases resulted in increased cost to patients. Only 51.9% of patients had indicators of wealth; 78.1% borrowed money to cover costs. Conservatively estimated median healthcare costs (US$ 21.30 per patient) were markedly lower than costs to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cost to patients of treating a case of agrochemical poisoning was approximately three times the cost of one month's essential items basket. Incorrect diagnosis at admission costs families substantial sums of money and increased length of stay; it costs the national government an estimated US$ 80 428.80 annually. Widespread access to a list of pesticides used in self-poisoning plus greater focus on training doctors to better manage different forms of agrochemical poisoning should reduce the financial burden to patients and healthcare systems.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Hospitalização , Praguicidas/intoxicação , Intoxicação/economia , Tentativa de Suicídio/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adolescente , Adulto , Bangladesh , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Equipamentos e Provisões/economia , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Intoxicação/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Classe Social , Adulto Jovem
19.
Sleep Med ; 38: 44-49, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29031755

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder that is frequently misdiagnosed, resulting in delays in proper treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze the cost-utility of training primary care providers (PCP) in early and accurate diagnosis of RLS. METHODS: We used a Markov model to compare two strategies: one where PCPs received training to diagnose RLS (informed care) and one where PCPs did not receive training (standard care). This analysis was conducted from the US societal and health sector perspectives over one-year, five-year, and lifetime (50-year) horizons. Costs were adjusted to 2016 USD, utilities measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and both measures were discounted annually at 3%. Cost, utilities, and probabilities for the model were obtained through a comprehensive review of literature. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to interpret our findings at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to test model uncertainty, in addition to calculating the expected value of perfect information. RESULTS: Providing training to PCPs to correctly diagnose RLS was cost-effective since it cost $2021 more and gained 0.44 QALYs per patient over the course of a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $4593/QALY. The model was sensitive to the utility for treated and untreated RLS. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that at $100,000/QALY, informed care had a 65.5% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: A program to train PCPs to better diagnose RLS appears to be a cost-effective strategy for improving outcomes for RLS patients.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Educação Médica Continuada/economia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/economia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/educação , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/economia , Simulação por Computador , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Análise Multivariada , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/terapia , Estados Unidos
20.
Anticancer Res ; 37(10): 5667-5671, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas (GEP-NENs) poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study described the medico-legal claims reported to a national governmental system that oversees compensation to patients with GEP-NENs Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Norwegian System of Compensation to Patients database was performed to identify claims evaluated between 2005-2016. The clinical information and the medico-legal evaluation were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified seven patients, five women and two men, with a median age of 57 (range=47-73) years. Delayed diagnosis (median diagnostic delay of 18 (range=6-48) months) was the main cause for claims in six out of the seven patients). Four patients received financial compensation based on the claim judgement. CONCLUSION: This review of claims that were evaluated by the Norwegian System of Compensation to Patients showed that a timely diagnosis of GEP-NENs remains a clinical challenge.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/economia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/terapia , Compensação e Reparação , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/economia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Erros Médicos/economia , Oncologia/economia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diagnóstico Tardio/economia , Erros de Diagnóstico/economia , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Masculino , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros de Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Noruega , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA